Thursday, June 16, 2011

Russia, China issue veiled warning to NATO

Russia and China warn the West; avoid interfering in Arab world


The plot thickens....................

This pronouncement comes on the heels of the Summit in Kazakhstan between Russia, China, and Iran.

It doesn't surprise me a bit, and I actually wonder how much of this comes at the behest of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad?

China and Russia, while full members of the UN Security Council, are NOT (full) members of NATO.

In my mind, things are falling into place.
Watching closely..............

T.W. 
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

The Economic Statistic US Elites Keep ‘Hush-Hush’

More bleak analysis of US financial crisis


When are the average citizens  going to wake up and realize just how screwed we truly are?

Our government, and especially the Federal Reserve, have traded away our future, along with those of our children, all the way to their grandchildren's future economic stability.
There is simply no way in sight out of this mess.

T.W.

from the article;

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


In its effort to counter the significant economic difficulties since 2008, the US government has added, or will have added, around $4 trillion in deficits (financed by new debt) in its three fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Yet, all this massive government deficit spending has failed to really ignite economic growth. Most likely this is because of the enormous dead weight of unproductive and onerous private sector debt, particularly that of consumer debt. Hence, real US GDP will have increased probably less than $1.5trn during these years. Including some further economic benefit in the years thereafter, a total GDP benefit of only about $2trn is probable.

So, $4trn borrowed for $2trn in GDP gains. Thus, in very rough round numbers, each new one dollar of US government debt might only produce $0.50 in new economic activity and probably only about $0.08 in new federal tax revenue. (Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is around 15 per cent.) Therefore, the economic marginal return for each new dollar of US government debt is possibly around -50 per cent! If you loaned someone $10 million and they gave you back $5m, you would not be happy!

Hence, it might not be long before those holding or buying US government bonds perceive the reality that the US government, and US economy, are losing massively on government borrowings. This will result in much, much higher US government bond yields and interest costs. Most importantly, it may make the rollover of US debt and new debt issuance incredibly difficult unless either US taxes rise stratospherically to cover the deficits, and/or the US Federal Reserve money printing goes into hyper-drive to purchase the debt the markets will not buy. (Of course US banks, pension funds etc., could also be forced to buy them.)



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Iran is jockeying for alliance with Russia, China

Iran attempting to ally with Russia/China
Published with Blogger-droid v1.7.1


The biggest roadblock with Russia is that their current President- Medvedev, isn't much of a fan.
However, old cowboy (and US hater) Putin is planning to move him aside and take back over.

This sort of alliance (Russia/Iran) is exactly the sort of thing mentioned in the Bible. Couple this with the new "revolutionary" middle eastern nations, the impending UN actions against Israel come September, and it all points to one thing:

Israel is in mortal danger.

Ezekiel 38 & 39.

T.W.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Wasn't this an episode of ' The A-Team' ?

I love it when a plan comes together-- or NOT!!!

I swear, this 'Charlie Foxtrot' sounds more ridiculous every time I read it.

Let me see.... a plane full of CASH goes missing in 2003, and no one has a clue what happened to BILLIONS of dollars?

Maybe these idiots need to investigate the whereabouts of Hannibal Smith, Face, B.A., and Howling Mad Murdoch.....

T.W.



~~~~~~~~~~~
Published with Blogger-droid v1.7.1

Police tracking ' real life Rambo' Montana wilderness

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/06/14/undersheriff-montana-manhunt-target-survivalist/
Published with Blogger-droid v1.7.1

Monday, June 13, 2011

Obama's Israel Policy Undermines Jewish State

At least there are some in the government who don't see it Obama's way on Israel.

Many Democrats are opposing Obama's ridiculous.stance on Israel.

Please call your Congressmen and Senators and express your support of the Senate legislation, and insist that the House introduce a similar measure to oppose Obama's position.

T.W.

Hatch: Obama's Israel Policy Undermines Jewish State


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Real reason Obama is calling for Israel to revert to 1967 borders

President Obama is anti-Semitic, plain and simple.
The first article was published well before Obama made his demand of Israel that they commit national suicide by reverting to their indefensible 1967 borders. How prophetic.

Anti-Semite Obama


The position by Obama and the UN amounts to nothing short of a wholesale sellout of the nation of Israel, and proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the anti-semitism of our current President.
Come September 2011, we shall see how anti-Israel the rest of the UN membership are.

Obama has taken great pains to alienate Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu, has offended them at every opportunity, and his call for Israel to revert back to their 1967 border is absolutely ludicrous, as every expert on the subject agrees that this move would amount to national suicide.

The American news media have all but buried the story and its developments, but this is gathering momentum as September rapidly approaches.
You better believe this issue is being watched very closely in Israel and Europe, even if the US media are intentionally not reporting it.

We are watching this developing story closely, and will continue to update.
Please pray for the nation of Israel, and the US.

T.W.

United Nations set for September sellout of Israel out to the "Palestinians"


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

South Texas enjoys major boom from oil fracking - Yahoo! News

I'm glad that this is happening all over the country, but this statement from the article bothers me;

"....Major industry players have joined the Eagle Ford project, including Anadarko, Range Resources and Shell. Chesapeake Energy of Oklahoma City signed a multi-billion dollar deal with the Chinese state-owned oil company to raise cash to drill in the shale."

The Chinese State-owned oil company?

So are they going to collect the oil themselves or collect on the sale??

My problem is that the US Gov't is so freaking backwards right now they won't allow off shore drilling, and won't openly sponsor new drilling in the continental US or Alaska, but they'll allow the Chinese to sponsor it??


Personally, I wish the US would drill everywhere we know there's oil, ramp up domestic and offshsore exploration, and explore the possibility of conversion to natural gas for vehicles.
We know there is massive, massive deposits of natgas. It burns cleaner and more effectively as well.


T.W.

South Texas enjoys major boom from oil fracking - Yahoo! News



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Scientists advocate putting antidepressants in public water supply

I worked in a busy Emergency Room for many years as a Nurse.
Nurses by far have the darkest senses of humor of any other demographic group on the planet.
We laugh to keep from crying, and inject very black humor into unimaginable circumstances in which we routinely find oursleves.
In other words, we crack jokes at very odd times, and the average civilain would find much of what we privately say to one another during such times quite objectionable, I'm certain.

One of my favorites used to be when the ER would be rocking late in the evening, full of trauma patients, medical crises, and the usual three or four psychiatric cases, sucide attempts, and various other cases stacked upon another.
The lobby would inevitably be standing room only, and complaints, even threats, would be hurled repeatedly at the hospital staff.
Well, at times like this, one of us would invariably remark, "we need a Valium salt lick in the ER lobby", or "what we need is aerial spraying of Prozac", among others.

Well, with all that being said, it looks as if it's not just ER Nurses that have this sense of humor.
Except that this is seriously being put out there by a group of British scientists;

Lithium in public water supplies to combat widespread depression.

I can think of at least a dozen medical reasons against this offhand, not to mention the multitude of legal/constitutionall issues such a thing would ignite.

Of course, it's all conjecture, but still, it makes one consider the 'what if' factor.

http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/05/22/052211-news-lithium-1-5/


Well, if all else fails, there's still the aerial spraying thing...............

Just sayin'.


T.W.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Friday, May 20, 2011

God's eternal Covenant with Israel

Genesis 12:3--
“I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you."

This was part of God's Covenant with Abraham.

This is why I have such a major problem with the betrayal of our brothers and sisters in Israel, and the entire Jewish people all over the world.

T.W.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


What is the Abrahamic Covenant?



A covenant is an agreement between two parties. There are two types of covenants: conditional and unconditional. A conditional or bilateral covenant is an agreement that is binding on both parties for its fulfillment. Both parties agree to fulfill certain conditions. If either party fails to meet their responsibilities, the covenant is broken and neither party has to fulfill the expectations of the covenant. An unconditional or unilateral covenant is an agreement between two parties, but only one of the two parties has to do something. Nothing is required of the other party.

The Abrahamic Covenant is an unconditional covenant. God made promises to Abraham that required nothing of Abraham. Genesis 15:18-21 describes a part of the Abrahamic Covenant, specifically dealing with the dimensions of the land God promised to Abraham and his descendants.

The actual Abrahamic Covenant is found in Genesis 12:1-3. The ceremony recorded in Genesis 15 indicates the unconditional nature of the covenant. The only time that both parties of a covenant would pass between the pieces of animals was when the fulfillment of the covenant was dependent upon both parties keeping commitments. Concerning the significance of God alone moving between the halves of the animals, it is to be noted that it is a smoking furnace and a flaming torch, representing God, not Abraham, which passed between the pieces. Such an act, it would seem, should be shared by both parties, but in this case it is doubtless to be explained by the fact that the covenant is principally a promise by God. He is the one who binds Himself. God caused a sleep to fall upon Abraham so that he would not be able to pass between the two halves of the animals. Fulfillment of the covenant fell to God alone.

God determined to call out a special people for Himself through whom He would bring blessing to all the nations. The Abrahamic Covenant is paramount to a proper understanding of the kingdom concept and is foundational to Old Testament theology. (1) The Abrahamic Covenant is described in Genesis 12:1–3 and is an unconditional covenant. There are no conditions attached to it (no “if” clauses, suggesting its fulfillment is dependent on man). (2) It is also a literal covenant in which the promises should be understood literally. The land that is promised should be understood in its literal or normal interpretation—it is not a figure of heaven. (3) It is also an everlasting covenant. The promises that God made to Israel are eternal.

There are three main features to the Abrahamic Covenant:

1. The promise of land (Genesis 12:1). God called Abraham from Ur of the Chaldees to a land that He would give him (Genesis 12:1). This promise is reiterated in Genesis 13:14–18 where it is confirmed by a shoe covenant; its dimensions are given in Genesis 15:18–21 (precluding any notion of this being fulfilled in heaven). The land aspect of the Abrahamic Covenant is also expanded in Deuteronomy 30:1–10, which is the Palestinian Covenant.

2. The promise of descendants (Genesis 12:2). God promised Abraham that He would make a great nation out of him. Abraham, who was 75 years old and childless (Genesis 12:4), was promised many descendants. This promise is amplified in Genesis 17:6 where God promised that nations and kings would descend from the aged patriarch. This promise (which is expanded in the Davidic Covenant of 2 Samuel 7:12–16) would eventuate in the Davidic throne with Messiah’s kingdom rule over the Hebrew people.

3. The promise of blessing and redemption (Genesis 12:3). God promised to bless Abraham and the families of the earth through him. This promise is amplified in the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–34; cf. Hebrews 8:6–13) and has to do with “Israel’s spiritual blessing and redemption.” Jeremiah 31:34 anticipates the forgiveness of sin. The unconditional and eternal nature of the covenant is seen in that the covenant is reaffirmed to Isaac (Genesis 21:12; 26:3–4). The “I will” promises suggest the unconditional aspect of the covenant. The covenant is further confirmed to Jacob (Genesis 28:14–15). It is noteworthy that God reaffirmed these promises amid the sins of the patriarchs, which fact further emphasizes the unconditional nature of the Abrahamic Covenant.

God’s method of fulfilling the Abrahamic Covenant is literal, inasmuch as God partially fulfilled the covenant in history: God blessed Abraham by giving him the land (Genesis 13:14–17); God blessed him spiritually (Genesis 13:8, 18; 14:22, 23; 21:22); God gave him numerous descendants (Genesis 22:17; 49:3–28). The important element of the Abrahamic Covenant, however, demands a future fulfillment with Messiah’s kingdom rule:

(1) Israel as a nation will possess the land in the future. Numerous Old Testament passages anticipate the future blessing of Israel and her possession of the land as promised to Abraham. Ezekiel envisions a future day when Israel is restored to the land (Ezekiel 20:33–37, 40–42; 36:1–37:28).

(2) Israel as a nation will be converted, forgiven, and restored (Romans 11:25–27).

(3) Israel will repent and receive the forgiveness of God in the future (Zechariah 12:10–14). The Abrahamic Covenant finds its ultimate fulfillment in connection with the return of Messiah to rescue and bless His people Israel. It is through the nation Israel that God promised in Genesis 12:1–3 to bless the nations of the world. That ultimate blessing will issue in the forgiveness of sins and Messiah’s glorious kingdom reign on earth.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mike Huckabee: "President Obama has betrayed Israel"

President Obama’s speech today is not going over well at all among the pro-Israel crowd.

Below is Mike Huckabee's statement. He has some harsh words for the President but can you blame him?

"President Obama has betrayed Israel and made a grievous mistake by suggesting borders of Israel go back to pre-1967 borders. This is an outrage to peace, sovereignty of Israel, and a stable Middle East. The nation of Israel was attacked in 1967 from all sides with a determination to annihilate her. Israel needs more security, not less. The Palestinians have steadfastly refused to acknowledge Israel's right to exist, despite long standing international law to the contrary. The President needs to worry less about the borders of Israel and start securing the borders of the United States."

Mike Huckabee: "President Obama has betrayed Israel"


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thursday, May 19, 2011

"Obama is the new Arafat"

This is what has become of our once-close relationship with the only truly free nation in the Middle East.

I sincerely hope that the Israeli people realize that this man speaks only for himself and the Progressive Left in this country, and not the actual majority of our citizens.

I wish I could say this was a surprise, but it certainly is not.
I have been saying for years that the US would be removed-from without or within-as an ally of Israel.
Again, I say read the Bible my friends.
Prophecy is being fulfilled at an alarming rate.

T.W.

'Obama adopting Arafat’s staged p... JPost - Diplomacy & Politics


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Obama says Palestine must be based in 1967 borders - Yahoo! News

If this actually does come to pass, it will put the nation of Israel in mortal danger.
Look at the pre-1967 borders.
It would be a possible to bottleneck a choke pint that would split Israel in half.

Mr. Obama has once again proven himself to be an enemy of Israel and the Jewish people.

T.W.

Obama says Palestine must be based in 1967 borders - Yahoo! News


"...President Barack Obama is endorsing the Palestinians' demand for their future state to be based on the borders that existed before the 1967 Middle East war, in a move that will likely infuriate Israel. Israel says the borders of a Palestinian state have to be determined through negotiations.

In a speech outlining U.S. policy in the Middle East and North Africa, Obama on Thursday sided with the Palestinians' opening position a day ahead of a visit to Washington by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu is vehemently opposed to referring to the 1967 borders.

Until Thursday, the U.S. position had been that the Palestinian goal of a state based on the 1967 borders, with agreed land swaps, should be reconciled with Israel's desire for a secure Jewish state through negotiations...."

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Legislation would allow the President to unilaterally declare War, even against US citizens

What if the President could bypass Congressional approval when considering military actions?

President Obama has done so in the case of Libya, and President Bush's Administration misled the public as to the reasons to invade Iraq. ( I personally think Bush was misled himself, but I digress..)

What if the President could authorize the us of US combat forces against the citizens within the US itself?

Well, my friends, it seems that there is a piece of legislation on the Congressional blotter that would do just this. It's part of the "National Defense Authorization Act" being deliberated by Congress.




Congressional Bill to allow the President to unilaterally use military forces to wage war, even within the US!!!

As I've been trying to tell people, the military is already being conditioned to the idea of being used against the citizens of this country.
 

read this from the Army Times from 2008;

Army Times article;

about 2/3 down the article;


"...they’ll learn new skills, use some of the ones they acquired in the war zone and more than likely will not be shot at while doing any of it.

They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.

Training for homeland scenarios has already begun at Fort Stewart and includes specialty tasks such as knowing how to use the “jaws of life” to extract a person from a mangled vehicle; extra medical training for a CBRNE incident; and working with U.S. Forestry Service experts on how to go in with chainsaws and cut and clear trees to clear a road or area.

The 1st BCT’s soldiers also will learn how to use “the first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded,” 1st BCT commander Col. Roger Cloutier said, referring to crowd and traffic control equipment and nonlethal weapons designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.....


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes, they do say that some of the training isn't meant to be used domestically, but the entire rest of it is unconstitutional.

The US military is not  to be used against its own citizens for "crowd control" or "civil unrest".

Call me paranoid, but I have been to numerous places that were supposedly "Democracies" that used its military against its own people. It was wrong then, and its wrong now.

More information is needed here.


T.W.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Iran denies UN report it exchanged missiles with N. Korea

Gee, I wonder if the N. Koreans are also giving the Iranians access to their nuclear technology??

The "mainstream media" is blind, dumb, and stupid.

Couple this with the Iranian missile bases under construction in Venezuela, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Only with these guys, there isn't a "mutually assured destruction" deterrent like there was with the Soviets.

The Iranians would be only too happy to martyr themselves. They think that something like this is exactly what is required to usher the return of their saviour, the "12th Imam".

And Hugo Chavez?

He's just plain crazy.

This needs intervention.

T.W.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Iran denies UN report it exchanged missiles with N. Korea


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Iran building Missile Base in Venezuela

I am too young to remember the Cuban Misslie Crisis.

I was born October 11 1962, during the height of the tensions, when the US and the Soviet Union stood on the brink of thermonuclear war.

My mother, however, remembers it vividly. She has told me many times of the fear, the terror, of those days. She was 18 years old, a young wife, and new mother of yours truly.

I am now 48 years old, and the father of four, grandfather of four (so far).

Are we to relive the terror of October 1962?

Will the Iranians follow through?

Will the Obama Administration do anything?

These are interesting times, my friends.................

T.W.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=220879

BERLIN – The Iranian government is moving forward with the construction of rocket launch bases in Venezuela, the German daily Die Welt wrote in its Thursday edition.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is Teheran's most important South American ally.

Iran is building intermediate- range missile launch pads on the Paraguaná Peninsula, and engineers from a construction firm – Khatam al-Anbia – owned by the Revolutionary Guards visited Paraguaná in February. Amir al-Hadschisadeh, the head of the Guard's Air Force, participated in the visit, according to the report. Die Welt cited information from "Western security insiders."

The rocket bases are to include measures to prevent air attacks on Venezuela as well as commando and control stations.

The Iranian military involvement in the project extends to bunker, barracks and watch tower construction. Twenty-meter deep rocket silos are planned. The cost of the Venezuelan military project is being paid for with Iranian oil revenue. The Iranians paid in cash for the preliminary phase of the project and, the total cost is expected to amount to "dozens of millions" of dollars, Die Welt wrote.

The Paraguaná Peninsula is on the coast of Venezuela and is roughly 120 kilometers from America's main South American partner, Columbia.

According to Die Welt, the clandestine agreement between Venezuela and Iran would mean the Chavez government would fire rocket at Iran's enemies should the Islamic Republic face military strikes.

Meanwhile the German press agency (DPA) reported on Friday that Germany will not contest the placement of the Hamburg- based European- Iranian Trade Bank (EIH) on the EU sanctions list at the end of the month. The US Treasury Department sanctioned the EIH last year, saying it was one of the most important institutions in Europe for financing Iran's missile and nuclear proliferation programs. Germany was the subject of criticism from American, French, British and Israeli officials because it refused to shut the EIH.

The EIH plays a crucial role in facilitating financial transactions for midsize German firms that are active in Iran. German- Iranian total trade amounted to over 4 billion euros in 2010, making German Iran's No. 1 EU trade partner.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sunday, May 15, 2011