Monday, November 28, 2016

Amid Stein/Clinton recount cacaphony, Michigan makes it official Monday-Trump won

Michigan actually announced last Tuesday I think it was, that Trump had won the state, and their 16 Electoral Votes, but the official "certification" was to take place today, as per Michigan state law.
They do a county by county canvassing after each election, a 'recount' if you will.
They've pretty much already said that's all they'd do.

Michigan officially certifies Trump as winner-Stein/Clinton go batshit crazy

..."A Michigan elections panel has certified Donald Trump as the winner in the state's presidential election, according to The Associated Press.

Trump won the state by 10,704 votes — a mere two-tenths of a percentage point — the tightest presidential race in the state's almost 200-year history. The result pushes Donald Trump's total to 306 electoral votes to 232 for Hillary Clinton.

The Michigan State Board of Canvassers unanimously certified the election results shortly after 2 p.m. today..."


Even the uber-Progressive ABC News propaganda machine can't hide the fact he won.


Sunday, November 27, 2016

The Democrats' REAL reason for wanting a recount

Note: It's been a while since I've posted a topic here-I just recently gave up my WordPress site, Blogger is so much easier to use. With the events of the past few days, I figured I'd get busy.


The Democrats' REAL reason for demanding 'recount'

November 27, 2016
The Democrats’ real strategy in launching recounts
By Richard Baehr

The recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states. No recount ever changes thousands of votes. I do not think that is the purpose.

The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters. If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232. No one hits 270.

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time this happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson.

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it? The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.


Ding ding, we have a winner.

Trump beat Clinton in Wisconsin by 27,257.
Michigan (scheduled to certify their results tomorrow after just completing a recount-as they always do in that state btw) by 10,704.
Pennsylvania? Trump won by 68,236.

There's no way they'll overturn the results.
So what's the point of all this?
They're trying to delegitimize his Presidency, so that in their agenda going forward, they can point to that "fact" every time they lose a Congressional vote, when he overturns an Obama Executive order, busts up Democratic 'treaties', reverses the Iran Nuclear deal, nominates Supreme Court Justices.
They're doing this to setup the 2018 mid-terms and the 2020 Presidential/Congressional elections.
Saul Alinsky, folks. Read the book.